Historical Reminder Judeo-Christian and Saint Paul

The majority of Christians believe that the Gospels were writ ten by direct witnesses

of the life of Jesus and therefore constitute unquestionable evidence concerning the

events high-lighting His life and preachings. One wonders, in the presence of such

guarantees of authenticity, how it is possible to discuss the teachings derived from

them and how one can cast doubt upon the validity of the Church as an institution

applying the general instructions Jesus Himself gave. Today's popular editions of the

Gospels contain commentaries aimed at propagating these ideas among the general

public.

The value the authors of the Gospels have as eye-witnesses is always presented to the

faithful as axiomatic. In the middle of the Second century, Saint Justin did, after all,

call the Gospels the 'Memoirs of the Apostles'. There are moreover so many details

proclaimed concerning the authors that it is a wonder that one could ever doubt their

accuracy. 'Matthew was a well-known character 'a customs officer employed at the

tollgate or customs house at Capharnaum'; it is even said that he spoke Aramaic and

Greek. Mark is also easily identifiable as Peter's colleague; there is no doubt that he

too was an eye-witness. Luke is the 'dear physician' of whom Paul talks: information

on him is very precise. John is the Apostle who was always near to Jesus, son of

Zebedee, fisherman on the Sea of Galilee.

Modern studies on the beginnings of Christianity show that this way of presenting

things hardly corresponds to reality. We shall see who the authors of the Gospels

really were. As far as the decades following Jesus's mission are concerned, it must be

understood that events did not at all happen in the way they have been said to have

taken place and that Peter's arrival in Rome in no way laid the foundations for the

Church. On the contrary, from the time Jesus left earth to the second half of the

Second century, there was a struggle between two factions. One was what one might

call Pauline Christianity and the other Judeo-Christianity. It was only very slowly that

the first supplanted the second, and Pauline Christianity triumphed over Judeo-

Christianity.

A large number of very recent works are based on contemporary discoveries about

Christianity. Among them we find Cardinal Daniélou's name. In December 1967 he

published an article in the review Studies (Etudes) entitled. 'A New Representation of

the Origins of Christianity: Judeo-Christianity'. (Une vision nouvelle des origines

chrétiennes, le judéo-christianisme). Here he reviews past works, retraces its history

and enables us to place the appearance of the Gospels in quite a different context from

the one that emerges on reading accounts intended for mass publication. What follows

is a condensed version of the essential points made in his article, including many

quotations from it.

After Jesus's departure, the "little group of Apostles" formed a "Jewish sect that

remained faithful to the form of worship practised in the Temple". However, when the

observances of converts from paganism were added to them, a 'special system' was

offered to them, as it were: the Council of Jerusalem in 49 A.D. exempted them from

42

circumcision and Jewish observances; "many Judeo-Christians rejected this

concession". This group was quite separate from Paul's. What is more, Paul and the

Judeo-Christians were in conflict over the question of pagans who had turned to

Christianity, (the incident of Antioch, 49 A.D.). "For Paul, the circumcision, Sabbath,

and form of worship practised in the Temple were henceforth old fashioned, even for

the Jews. Christianity was to free itself from its political-cum-religious adherence to

Judaism and open itself to the Gentiles."

For those Judeo-Christians who remained 'loyal Jews,' Paul was a traitor. Judeo-

Christian documents call him an 'enemy', accuse him of 'tactical double-dealing', . . .

'"Until 70 A.D., Judeo-Christianity represents the majority of the Church" and "Paul

remains an isolated case". The head of the community at that time was James, a

relation of Jesus. With him were Peter (at the beginning) and John. "James may be

considered to represent the Judeo-Christian camp, which deliberately clung to

Judaism as opposed to Pauline Christianity." Jesus's family has a very important place

in the Judeo-Christian Church of Jerusalem. "James's successor was Simeon, son of

Cleopas, a cousin of the Lord".

Cardinal Danielou here quotes Judeo-Christian writings which express the views on

Jesus of this community which initially formed around the apostles: the Gospel of the

Hebrews (coming from a Judeo-Christian community in Egypt), the writings of

Clement: Homilies and Recognitions, 'Hypotyposeis', the Second Apocalypse of

James, the Gospel of Thomas.[22] "It is to the Judeo-Christians that one must ascribe

the oldest writings of Christian literature." Cardinal Daniélou mentions them in detail.

"It was not just in Jerusalem and Palestine that Judeo-Christianity predominated

during the first hundred years of the Church. The Judeo-Christian mission seems

everywhere to have developed before the Pauline mission. This is certainly the

explanation of the fact that the letters of Paul allude to a conflict." They were the

same adversaries he was to meet everywhere: in Galatia, Corinth, Colossae, Rome

and Antioch.

The Syro-Palestinian coast from Gaza to Antioch was Judeo-Christian '"as witnessed

by the Acts of the Apostles and Clementine writings". In Asia Minor, the existence of

Judeo-Christians is indicated in Paul's letters to the Galatians and Colossians. Papias's

writings give us information about Judeo-Christianity in Phrygia. In Greece, Paul's

first letter to the Corinthians mentions Judeo-Christians, especially at Apollos.

According to Clement's letter and the Shepherd of Hermas, Rome was an 'important

centre'. For Suetonius and Tacitus, the Christians represented a Jewish sect. Cardinal

Daniélou thinks that the first evangelization in Africa was Judeo-Christian. The

Gospel of the Hebrews and the writings of Clement of Alexandria link up with this.

It is essential to know these facts to understand the struggle between communities that

formed the background against which the Gospels were written. The texts that we

have today, after many adaptations from the sources, began to appear around 70 A.D.,

the time when the two rival communities were engaged in a fierce struggle, with the

Judeo-Christians still retaining the upper hand. With the Jewish war and the fall of

Jerusalem in 70 A.D. the situation was to be reversed. This is how Cardinal Daniélou

explains the decline:

43

"After the Jews had been discredited in the Empire, the Christians tended to detach

themselves from them. The Hellenistic peoples of Christian persuasion then gained

the upper hand. Paul won a posthumous victory. Christianity separated itself

politically and sociologically from Judaism; it became the third people. All the same,

until the Jewish revolt in 140 A.D., Judeo-Christianity continued to predominate

culturally"

From 70 A.D. to a period sometime before 110 A.D. the Gospels of Mark, Matthew,

Luke and John were produced. They do not constitute the first written Christian

documents: the letters of Paul date from well before them. According to O. Culmann,

Paul probably wrote his letter to the Thessalonians in 50 A.D. He had probably

disappeared several years prior to the completion of Mark's Gospel.

Paul is the most controversial figure in Christianity. He was considered to be a traitor

to Jesus's thought by the latter's family and by the apostles who had stayed in

Jerusalem in the circle around James. Paul created Christianity at the expense of those

whom Jesus had gathered around him to spread his teachings. He had not known

Jesus during his lifetime and he proved the legitimacy of his mission by declaring that

Jesus, raised from the dead, had appeared to him on the road to Damascus. It is quite

reasonable to ask what Christianity might have been without Paul and one could no

doubt construct all sorts of hypotheses on this subject. As far as the Gospels are

concerned however, it is almost certain that if this atmosphere of struggle between

communities had not existed, we would not have had the writings we possess today.

They appeared at a time of fierce struggle between the two communities. These

'combat writings', as Father Kannengiesser calls them, emerged from the multitude of

writings on Jesus. These occurred at the time when Paul's style of Christianity won

through definitively, and created its own collection of official texts. These texts

constituted the 'Canon' which condemned and excluded as unorthodox any other

documents that were not suited to the line adopted by the Church.

The Judeo-Christians have now disappeared as a community with any influence, but

one still hears people talking about them under the general term of 'Judaïstic'. This is

how Cardinal Daniélou describes their disappearance:

"When they were cut off -from the Great Church, that gradually freed itself from its

Jewish attachments, they petered out very quickly in the West. In the East however it

is possible to find traces of them in the Third and Fourth Centuries A.D., especially in

Palestine, Arabia, Transjordania, Syria and Mesopotamia. Others joined in the

orthodoxy of the Great Church, at the same time preserving traces of Semitic culture;

some of these still persist in the Churches of Ethiopia and Chaldea".

44